The Legality of a “Ceiling of Care”
In Health Service Executive v P.J. [2026] IEHC 291, the High Court considered whether clinicians may lawfully withhold life-prolonging treatment where a patient refuses intervention but lacks decision-making capacity.
The case concerned a 78-year-old man suffering from severe depressive illness who consistently refused psychiatric treatment, medication, nutrition and other medical interventions. A treating psychiatrist placed a “ceiling of care” order on his chart, directing that treatment should be offered, but not forced, including no coercive feeding and no CPR.
Although the patient could understand and communicate information, the Court accepted medical evidence that he was unable to properly use or weigh that information when making decisions about his care.
The Court reaffirmed several important principles:
- There is a presumption of capacity under the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015
- The Court’s role is not to direct clinical treatment, but to determine whether proposed treatment decisions are legally permissible
- Clinicians may refrain from invasive or coercive treatment where it is considered futile, harmful or disproportionate
Ultimately, the Court authorised the “ceiling of care”, finding that it respected the patient’s longstanding wishes and values while permitting non-coercive palliative care to preserve dignity and comfort at the end of life.
If you have any questions our specialized team is here to help.
You can contact McCormack Solicitors on
Email: info@carolmccormacksolicitors.ie
Phone: 071 9621846
www.carolmccormacksolicitors.ie
Disclaimer:
The contents of these pages are provided as an information guide only. While every effort is made in preparing material for publication no responsibility is accepted by or on behalf of McCormack Solicitors for any errors, omissions or misleading statements on these pages or any site to which these pages connect.